W

In the Face of U.N. Evidence, the Iranian Lie Continues (ContributorNetwork)

in swap , by

COMMENTARY | The U.N. International Atomic Energy Agency declared Tuesday that Iran has plans to develop a nuclear weapon. How much longer do we have to listen to Iranian officials lie to the world?

The report obtained by The Associated Press said there are aspects of the Iranian nuclear program designed specifically for weapons production, while other elements are for peaceful, civilian use. It appears Iran is attempting to find experts and highly specialized equipment through backdoor means in an effort to avoid publicly revealing its true plans.

In typical fashion, it didn’t take Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad long to jump to a podium and denounce the report, the U.N. agency and the U.S. Associated Press reported that, in televised comments, Ahmadinejad denied the findings and claimed Iran seeks only to develop nuclear power for civilian, peaceful use. His words are as empty as they are on any other subject. Even when confronted with irrefutable evidence, Ahmadinejad will continue to deny it.

The Obama administration is considering tougher sanctions to force Iran into full disclosure and, ultimately, into abandoning its nuclear ambitions. According to Reuters, getting any more sanctions — or Security Council authorization for use of force — would be nearly impossible given the likelihood of a veto by permanent members China and Russia. That may force Obama to act unilaterally.

Sanctions only work when they are the concerted effort of many countries. In fact, the tighter the noose is around Iran’s ability to trade with the rest of the world, the better. Associated Press reported Russia would not honor the sanctions, so Iran’s program continues unabated. Iran needs to be totally and completely isolated. Unilateral sanctions would only hurt American businesses.

Israel has been exceptionally patient of late. In fact, other than a bit of saber rattling over the weekend, they have been rather quiet. Reuters said Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told his Cabinet to remain silent about the report despite official posturing by the Israeli government over the past week suggesting a military solution. There is no greater risk of Israeli response, as the findings were already common knowledge to American officials.

Given the world’s gluttony for oil, it’s hard to believe there could be a united effort to turn off Iran’s oil spigot. But, that’s exactly what the world needs to do. Deprive them of their only source of cash and we’ll get the Iranians attention. How to accomplish that is the problem.

Dan McGinnis is a freelance writer, published author and former newspaper publisher. He has been a candidate, campaign manager and press secretary for state and local political campaigns for more than 30 years.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/un/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ac/20111109/us_ac/10398261_in_the_face_of_un_evidence_the_iranian_lie_continues

new zealand earthquake 2011 colorado ymca oxycodone harold camping cdc revelations

W

Longtime CBS correspondent Robert Pierpoint dies (AP)

in swap , by

LOS ANGELES ? CBS News correspondent Robert C. Pierpoint ? who covered six presidents, the Korean War, the Kennedy assassination and the Iranian hostage crisis in a career that spanned more than four decades ? died Saturday in California, his daughter said. He was 86.

Pierpoint, who retired in 1990, died of complications from surgery at Santa Barbara Cottage Hospital, Marta Pierpoint told The Associated Press. He had broken his hip Oct. 12 at the Santa Barbara Retirement Community where he lived with his wife Patricia.

After making his name covering the Korean War ? a role he reprised when he provided his radio voice for the widely watched final episode of “MASH” in 1983 ? Pierpoint became a White House correspondent during the Dwight D. Eisenhower administration, a position he would hold through the Jimmy Carter administration.

“He lived quite an amazing life,” said Marta Pierpoint. She said her father was most proud of his coverage of the Korean War, Watergate and most of all the Kennedy assassination, an event that would still bring him to tears in an interview with his hometown paper three weeks before his death.

“I didn’t like what the priest said about a time to live and a time to die,” Robert Pierpoint told the Santa Barbara News-Press in an Oct. 2 story. “It was not Kennedy’s time to die.”

Pierpoint said his “one bad mistake” the day of the assassination was not revealing that Jacqueline Kennedy had blood on her pink suit when she walked out of her husband’s hospital room.

“I didn’t describe the blood, and I should have,” he said. “I was in shock.”

Pierpoint said of the six administrations he covered, Kennedy’s was the most fun.

“He was not afraid of the press,” Pierpoint told the News-Press. “He had been a reporter. He knew everyone in the White House press corps by name and reputation and joked with us. He was comfortable in his own skin.”

Pierpoint said his first White House assignment, the Dwight D. Eisenhower administration starting in 1957, was not as easy. He said Eisenhower was “a relatively good president, but he wasn’t a good communicator. I didn’t feel that I did a good job, but they kept me on.”

CBS certainly did keep Pierpoint on at the White House, for 23 years, a period he chronicled in his 1981 memoir, “At the White House.”

He moved to covering the State Department in 1980, and ended his career on the show “Sunday Morning” with Charles Kuralt.

Born May 16, 1925, in Redondo Beach, Calif., Pierpoint joined the Navy in 1943 but didn’t see action. He graduated from the University of Redlands, where his papers and archives are now kept, in 1948.

While a graduate student at the University of Stockholm he began work as a stringer for CBS, and found his calling. His coverage of an attempted Communist coup in Finland won him attention, and he was sent to Tokyo as a full-time correspondent, which led to his coverage of the entire Korean War.

Pierpoint shifted as the news business did from radio to television, and appeared on the first episode of Edward R. Murrow’s “See It Now” in 1951, eventually becoming one of the close Murrow associates known as “Murrow’s Boys.”

Before his career was over he had won two Emmys with other reporters, including one for his work on a 1989 banking scandal just before his retirement.

During retirement he was a frequent speaker and frequently went fishing in Montana.

He also didn’t hesitate to give his opinion on the directions the White House went after he left, saying recently that he was not impressed with President Obama.

“He’s not a fighter. He surrenders to Congress before it’s necessary,” Pierpoint told the News-Press. “Lyndon Johnson was a fighter. He fought for what he believed in. He was wrong on Vietnam, but right on civil rights.”

In addition to Patricia, he is survived by four children, including actor Eric Pierpoint, who has appeared “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen,” and “Liar, Liar” with Jim Carrey.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/obits/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111023/ap_en_tv/us_obit_robert_pierpoint

buckyballs buckyballs jets gilad annie hall jon lester mitchel musso

W

Steve Jobs: An Uber-Nerd Who Made Even Business, and the …

in swap , by

4:28 p.m. | Updated Much has been and will be written about Steve Jobs?s outsize footprint in digital culture: the screens we stare at, the music files we listen to, the hardware in our pockets. I?d stipulate to all that, but I found myself thinking about his less obvious influence on business and the journalists who cover it.

Business has always been important, but until Mr. Jobs arrived, it was rarely accused of being cool. As a young reporter I made a lane change from writing about pop culture and politics to business, and I can remember the look of sympathy from my colleagues and the message that went with it: Good luck in the Land of the Suits. Business, while vital to the civic common, was not thought to be an important part of the stories that we tell each other.

It was not always thus. In the 1940s, Henry Luce, using both Time and Fortune, made business seem remarkable, with portraits of the lions of capitalism coursing down the broad avenues of New York in taxis on the way to doing remarkable things that made the hopelessness of the Great Depression seem distant. But as success became routine, it also became institutionalized, with faceless corporations like U.S. Steel and General Motors lording over the smooth running engines of commerce. With the tumult of Vietnam and the battle for civil rights grabbing the headlines, news about business seemed very much beside the point.

Business and business news regained luster when the masters of the universe began to lord over Wall Street in the 1980s, but it became obvious to the press, perhaps too slowly, that many of them were simply common thieves with extra zeroes behind their crimes. This was just after Mr. Jobs and Steve Wozniak came storming out of their garage in the late ?70s. They seemed remarkable in a business environment that seemed to belong to men with gray hair and fancy suits hiding their expansive guts, as well as their considerable earnings.

As America switched from a country that made things to one that bought them, so much of business began to exist in the abstract, with deeds exchanged and stocks sold. Mr. Jobs did not just move money around. He made things that he promised would change the world, and they often did. The fact that Mr. Jobs and Apple made objects that consumers could touch, and often did, made him someone worth writing about and paying attention to no matter what he did. Steve Jobs was not a suit. He said that taking LSD was one of the formative experiences of his life and had very little interest in consumer research.


Beyond that, no one played the press like Mr. Jobs. It had less to do with his black turtleneck than the head for business that floated above it. From the very beginning, he understood that any consumer enterprise had to have a strong element of show business, to create excitement and demand. An Apple launch had less to do with a traditional product rollouts than the magician?s ?reveal,? a moment of wonder in which a mystery morphed into an actual product. Yes, sometimes the devices were magical, but all the more so because of how they arrived. In his presentations, his products sometimes literally introduced themselves.

In this context, the press was neither enemy nor ally to Mr. Jobs, but just one more tool in the kit. He understood the media?s appetite for what they did not know, and he tantalized them with scarcity and secrecy. Other chief executives would play footsie with reporters, feeding them a little kibble now and then to keep them interested. When Mr. Jobs called a reporter ? he called me a few times ? it was to argue, compliment or admonish, probing and searching, but all the while giving away nothing fundamentally interesting about the company. Steve Jobs never showed any leg until he was good and ready.

Others have tried to duplicate the approach, but over the long haul, theatrics don?t matter unless you deliver. Mr. Jobs was an impresario who came through, time and again, so his shows were always well attended.

His well-documented force field extended to other corners of business coverage. Failure was never much of a credential until Mr. Jobs got hold of it. There was the flop of the Lisa computer during his first tour at Apple, the specter of him being forced to walk the plank at his own company, and then the face-planting when he was on his own with NeXT.

Those pratfalls would be enough to sink any business executive for good, but Mr. Jobs never bought into things like reputational damage or fatal mistakes. To him, all those events were just inflection points on his way to changing computing, music, telecommunications and publishing. The future vindicated his past ? first in his return to Apple and then as a creator and owner of Pixar.

His ability to rise from the dead made him scary. No one commanded the respect of the press like Mr. Jobs. I can remember a visit he made to The New York Times when the first iPad came out. The Times is a notoriously blas? place, where heads of state have been known to come and go without raising an eyebrow. But when Mr. Jobs came, the effect was electric. For three days, his advance team swept through our place, attending to every detail and making sure his time there would be seamless and glitch-free.

We were all seated when he came in, in part because there were medical reasons for him to avoid grip and grins, but the whole rock star thing was in high effect. And then it was on. No one asks a casual question of Steve Jobs.

That?s partly because Steve Jobs loved to argue. One of his great gifts was his ability to deal with geeks, business wonks and media savants on their own terms and often come up on top. Sometimes he did it based on facts; other times, just plain stubbornness. Just as he made the mouse and the disc drive disappear simply by saying it should be so, he prevailed in long-running debates over software and the media business through steady assertion ? using all the leverage that his products and online retail presence conveyed.

Which brings us back to how he changed business journalism ? its image and its attractiveness. Because he was a showman, because he made interesting things that consumers cared about, readers began to follow his products as they might a band or their favorite team. Being an Apple user became a marker of cultural identity and conveyed cool. Some of that splashed onto those who covered business.

Now, young reporters with good prospects often start in business coverage, becoming conversant in unit sales, earnings per share, and Ebidta. The best and brightest of them can be found chasing the latest rumor out of Silicon Valley or peering under the hood of the just-hatched start-up. There are a lot of forces in play that make that so, but you?d have to credit Steve Jobs with making business something that did not belong to the suits.

Business reporters hated Apple?s secrecy and found Mr. Jobs?s arrogance wearying, but we all knew that our craft picked up some glitz and esteem because of his involvement. Our readers, his consumers, cared about the guy and everything he did. He made business cool by using it to make cool stuff. It was fun to be along for the ride.

Source: http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/06/steve-jobs-he-brought-the-show-to-business/

niger chf temperature caroline wozniacki caroline wozniacki ua ua

Tagged with: